As ITIL defines it, Incident priority is primarily formed out of it's Impact and Urgency. There are also additional elements, like size, scope, complexity and resources required for resolution.
So, most consultants recommend the simple matrix which will automatically calculate incident priority out of the simple value of Impact x Urgency.
Recommended granulation of Priority is 4 to 5 different values.
Usually the lower the value - the higher the Priority, thus Priority=1 is the highest one, and Priority=5 the lowest.
There are also some sophisticated methods for defining Priority, but eventually it all boils down to something like:
Picture: Standard Priority Matrix
Impact of the incident is the measure of how business critical it is. Since this is difficult to determine in shoes of overworked and underpaid 1st level operator, some simplifications are necessary here. So impact is usually directly proportional to a number of users influenced by the incident. If an up-to date CMDB is available, then it's easy to determine affected users from the Business Service which suffers from specific Configuration Item malfunction.
Urgency is a necessary speed of resolving an incident. Some incident management tools perform automatic calculations for Urgency based on Impact, SLA and OLA involved etc. Nice feature if you have it. If not, a simple workaround would be to educate Service Desk operators on a regular basis and to inform them on parameters of signed contracts. Incident Urgency for certain Services may vary in time (example: HR application during payroll calculation) and this additional complexity is easier to resolve by raising staff awareness level then to implement it in software tools.
Major Incident is an incident with extreme impact to business, or an excessive disruption of service. It will have Priority=1, and additionally, depending on your SLA and support process definition, it usually has additional attribute (checkbox is fine) that says this is a Major or Hot incident. All key Support Staff members attend to resolution of major incidents, and the project is strongly supported by Problem Management.
Also, should be said here that Incidents do not age gracefully. Data on that reside in the escalation schemes, based on Service Level Agreement (SLA) targets. If an incident owner can't deal with that, his manager has to be notified in time.
Update: Incident Escalation
Just a few words on Incident escalations. Escalations are mechanisms that help us to resolve incidents on time. There are two major types:
Functional Escalation - reassigning incidents to a higher tier support group due to lack of expertise. Also, this can happen after a predefined time interval passes, in accordance with SLA.
Picture: Functional Escalation
Hierarchical Escalation - when a support employee can't deal with an incident, either due to lack of knowledge or insufficient time, his manager has to be informed in order to preserve SLA targets and customer satisfaction. In practice, this escalation type usually boils down to a simple notification to the manager.
Picture: Hierarchical Escalation
Free Downloads MindMaps: Templates: Posters: |
  | Sponsored Links
|
Showing posts with label Categorization. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Categorization. Show all posts
Jun 1, 2007
Incident Priority - What Everyone Should Know
Posted by
doctor
at
9:38 AM
13
comments
Labels: Categorization, Classification, Incident Management
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)